|
Plasma Assisted Coatings for the Plastics Industry
0. S. Kolluri, S. L. Kaplan, D. A. Frazier
Presented at the Fourth International Conference on Surface Modification
Technologies
November, 1990, Paris, France
ABSTRACT
Plasma processes are being used in a myriad applications in all
industries employing plastics. Medical disposables, prosthetic devices, high voltage
coils, electronic housings, painted fascias, adhesively bonded plastic assemblies, and
metallized plastics all use plasma processes to enhance the effectiveness and permanency
of the secondary process.
As plasma processing becomes commonplace in the plastics industry, more
attention is being given to complex applications. This paper discusses plasma assisted
coatings as they relate to modifying materials for composites, barrier applications, and
for treating materials whose surface can be modified only with great difficulty using
conventional techniques. The structure of coatings obtained through the use of different
monomers is related to process conditions and end-use performance. Suggestions for future
research and the potential benefits offered by plasma assisted deposition are described.
BACKGROUND
A designer typically has to make several compromises in the selection
of materials. The preferred material may not be useable due to a lack of essential surface
properties for the application. In the case of products made of plastics, the balancing of
bulk to surface property requirements has always been the Achilles heel of optimum design.
For example, the use of polypropylene, a low cost resin, may be the preferred material for
a specific packaging application. Preferred because of its processability, weight,
strength and cost, but unusable by itself because of its gas permeation properties.
The methods available to the processor for modifying surface properties
have been limited to flame or corona treatment or wet chemical techniques. Flame and
corona treatments, though useful in oxidizing the surfaces of plastics, have
limited utility in many applications and the transitory nature of these
modifications prevent their widespread use in many situations. Unlike plasma discharges
which are typically conducted in a vacuum, corona processes rely on the ionization of air
resulting from a high voltage point discharge across a small gap. As a consequence, not
only are internal surfaces of complex shapes difficult to treat but sensitive materials
can be damaged very easily. Wet chemical treatments, which offer an alternative method,
suffer from problems of toxicity and environmental effects.
For many of these applications, cold gas plasma surface treatment has
become the preferred industrial processing technique. Applications range from surface
modifications of plastics in the electronics industry to treatment of plastic automotive
components and biomedical devices. This technology has facilitated the development of many
products and increased use of plastics in these applications.
Plasma processing is not one process but a "field of opportunities"
which can be classified into three categories that often overlap. These are: (1) plasma
activation, (2) plasma-induced grafting, and (3) plasma polymerization. Plasma activation
is the alteration of surface characteristics by the substitution of chemical groups or
moieties for groups normally present on the polymer chain being modified. The assumed
mechanism is free radical creation and coupling of these free radicals with active species
from the plasma environment. Depending on the process gas selected, a large variety of
chemical groups can be incorporated into the surface. These groups may be hydroxy,
carbonyl, carboxylic, amino, or peroxyl groups. Most importantly, the insertion or
substitution of these groups in the polymer chain is under the control of the operator.
Therefore, the surface energies and the surface chemical reactivity of plastics can be
completely altered without affecting their bulk properties.
Plasma-induced grafting offers another method by which plastic surfaces
can be modified. If a noble gas is employed to generate a plasma, a multitude of free
radicals are created along the polymer backbone. If after the plasma
is extinguished but prior to the introduction of air, an unsaturated monomer such as allyl
alcohol is introduced into the reaction chamber, it will add to the free radical yielding
a grafted polymer. The range of functional and reactive sites that can be incorporated
onto a surface is significantly increased with this technique. This process differs from
activation in that instead of functional modification of the surface polymer chains,
material is added on to the polymer backbone.
The third category of plasma processes - plasma deposition - utilizes
gases or vapors that fractionate and undergo polymerization under the influence of RF
energy. For instance methane (CH4) under the influence of plasma will deposit
as a polyhydrocarbon that has a density approaching 1.6 gm/cc. Any material that can be
introduced into the process chamber is a potential candidate as a feed material for plasma
polymerization. The properties of materials polymerized in this manner are unique from
polymers obtained from these same materials via conventional polymerization methods. These
properties include a high degree of crosslinking and the ability to form pinhole-free
films that adhere tenaciously to various substrates.
Gases in plasma may undergo polymerization, usually via a free radical
initiation process. When a gas is ionized by radio frequency energy, the resulting plasma
contains free electrons as well as other meta stable particles. When the process gas
mixture used consists wholly or in part of hydrocarbon gases, the hydrocarbon is fractured
into free radical fragments. These free radical fragments become the sites at which the
polymerization process is initiated. As the molecular weight of the plasma polymerized
product increases, it is deposited onto the substrate placed within the plasma chamber.
Since the fragmentation of the feed gas in the plasma generates free radical species for
initiating the polymerization process, gases such as methane (CH4), which have
zero functionality, can be used to form plasma polymers.(1) In addition to
methane, plasma polymers have been formed from other hydrocarbon gases such as ethylene or
propylene, and organosilicon compounds such as hexamethyldisiloxane (HMDSO) or
vinyltrimethylsilane lane (VTMS).(1,2,3) Due to the complex nature of the
fragmentation process, the resulting polymer structure is unlike any that can be deduced
from conventional polymerization mechanisms. The degree to which the monomer is fragmented
is dependent on the amount of energy supplied per unit weight of monomer that is allowed
to flow through the reactor. When sufficient energy is supplied to break all the bonds of
the monomer molecule, the recombination or polymerization process becomes atomic in
nature. In addition, the structure of the plasma polymers can be varied by changing
reaction conditions including the use of co-monomers or the introduction of oxygen,
nitrogen, or ammonia into the reaction chamber during the polymerization process. (4)
EQUIPMENT CONSIDERATIONS
Numerous types of reactors are used for the deposition of plasma
polymers. Glass/quartz reactors or aluminum chambers with metal parallel-plate electrodes
seem to predominate in the literature, although several investigators have used
inductively or capacitively coupled systems with external electrodes. The radio frequency
(RF) excitation used by various equipment manufacturers can be as low as 2 KHz to 4 KHz,
or can be the more typical 13.56 MHz (high frequency). Microwave plasma systems have also
been used for the deposition of plasma polymers. Previous studies have shown that the
densities of films deposited by low frequency systems are significantly lower than films
deposited either by the high frequency or microwave plasma systems. The choice of
equipment used for plasma polymerization and deposition is thus dictated by both the rate
of deposition desired, the film properties that can be obtained by the various systems and
practical considerations such as the size of the parts to be treated and processing rates
that are feasible in any given system.
The films evaluated in this study were deposited in a Plasma Science PS
0500. This reactor uses capacitively-coupled internal electrodes for generating a primary
plasma. A 550 watt RF source operating at 13.56 MHz is used for ionizing the process
gases.
Monomers such as methane, hexamethyl-disiloxane, propylene, and
vinyltrimethoxysilane were used to deposit films on either silicon wafers or 2 mil MylarTM
films. Gaseous monomers were introduced into the reactor through one of three mass
flow controllers that are a part of the system. In the case of liquid monomers, a flask
containing these monomers was connected directly to the reactor chamber via a stainless
steel tubing with a shut off valve installed in the line. Since the end of the tube in the
flask was above the liquid level, we were assured that only monomer vapor would be drawn
into the reactor by the vacuum system. Permeation properties were measured with an
instrument manufactured by Modern Controls. ESCA was used to determine the chemical nature
of the films.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Table I below shows some typical deposition rates that have been
reported for various monomers in continuous and pulsed RF discharges.(4)
TABLE I
Deposition Rates of Various Compounds
| |
Deposition Rate |
|
| Compound |
D(x 108 gm/cm2 *min) |
D/Do |
| Hexamethyldisiloxane |
233 = Do |
1.00 |
| Acrylic acid |
28 |
0.12 |
| Styrene |
173 |
0.74 |
| Tetramethylclisiloxane |
191 |
0.82 |
| Divinyltetramethy1disiloxane |
641 |
2.75 |
| Ethylene |
42 |
0.18 |
| Benzene |
110 |
0.47 |
The thickness of the films deposited in the experiments reported in
this paper were not sufficient to provide an accurate measure of deposition rates in the
PS 0500. We polymerized hexamethyldisiloxane, propylene, methane, and
vinyltrimethoxysilane monomers for the purpose of depositing barrier films. MylarTM
film with a thickness of 2 mils was chosen as the substrate for measuring oxygen
transmission rates. Both methane and propylene gave us barrier-films that reduced oxygen
transmission rates of the MylarTM films by approximately 56%. The oxygen
transmission was reduced from 2.15 cc/ 100 in /day for a 2 mil Film to 0.95 cc/ 100
in/day. Samples with films deposited from vinyltrimethoxysilane and hexamethydisiloxane,
however, did not show any improvement in barrier properties when compared with untreated
films. Barrier properties are best obtained when dense pinhole free films such as glass
are deposited on to substrates. ESCA analysis of the films that were deposited can help
explain the observed phenomenon. Table 2, pg. 6 shows elemental analysis of films
deposited from continuous polymerization of vinyltrimethoxysilane for various exposure
times. In all cases the reactor power was set at 200 watts.
From these results we postulated the following:
1) The C-C/OCH3 ratio has increased from 0.67 for the
monomer to 1.63 in the film indicating loss of the OCH3 groups resulting in
formation of an Si-O-Si linkage.
2) The composition data suggests an enrichment of SI and 0 relative to
carbon. This is primarily due to the loss of methyl groups from the fragmentation of the
ether bond in the methoxy radical.
3) Cleavage within the methoxy fragment is further evidenced by the
decrease in the -OCH /Si ratio from a value of 3.0 for the monomer to an average value of
1.4 for the deposited films.
4) The average OCH3 /Si ratio of 1.5 and the average
O/Si ratio of 2.5 suggests that there are 1.5 OCH3 groups per Si atom and
2.5 oxygen atoms per Si atom.
The following structure for the deposited film is suggested in contrast
to the glassy SiOx coating that we originally attempted to deposit with this monomer:
Deposited Film Structure

If the key ratios for the theoretical model are compared with those
obtained for our films, the structure that has been postulated appears. This comparison is
shown in table 3, pg. 6. It should be noted that H atoms are not included in the
calculation of atomic percentages.
The bulky and open structure that resulted from our process can explain
the poor barrier performance against a small molecule such as oxygen. Post treatment of
the films deposited in this manner with an oxygen plasma did not improve the permeability
characteristics. Wydeven reported a similar type of film when polymerizing
vinyltrimethoxysilane monomer in a pulsed RF discharge.(6) From the ESCA data
that was reported, the following comparison can be made between the atomic
composition for the proposed model and the film deposited by Wydeven (table 4). The data
suggests that similar structures are obtained with both continuous and pulsed RF
discharges with vinyltrimethoxysilane monomer.
TABLE 4
| |
Wydeven Data- vs
Proposed Model |
| |
Wydeven Data |
Proposed Model |
| C1 |
16.0% |
15.0% |
| C2 |
8.0% |
10.0% |
| 0 |
17.0% |
16.0% |
| Si |
6.4% |
6.4% |
| H |
53.0% |
53.0% |
Previous work by Rose et al (7), has shown that plasma
polymerization of organic monomers can lead to both atomic rearrangement, as in the case
of acrylonitrile, or no rearrangement as in the case of styrene. The films that we
evaluated by ESCA were deposited onto silicon substrates. ESCA spectrum of plasma
polymerized styrene shows a perfect likeness to that of polystyrene (figure 1 and figure
2. pg. 7).
The pi-pi* intensity is identical in plasma polymerized styrene and
conventional polystyrene indicating that the phenyl ring was deposited intact onto the
wafer substrate. In contrast, acrylonitrile is atomically rearranged during plasma
deposition. Using ESCA data (fig. 3 and fig. 4, pp. 7,8), the plasma polymer was
characterized as having an 80:20 C:N ratio, with a carbon structure suggesting a 1: 1
ratio of C--C: C-C _= N and C =N. The compositions of these films
deposited onto silicon wafers and carbon fiber are shown in table 5, pg. 6.
As we stated earlier in the introduction, the structure of the polymer
film that is deposited is determined by the degree to which the monomer is fragmented by
the ionization process. When polymerizing methane onto MylarTM film substrates
in our laboratory, we appear to have deposited a film that is similar to glassy carbon.
Upon comparison of the ESCA spectrum obtained on this film (figure 6, pg. 8) with the
spectra for glassy carbon shown by McFeeley et al, (8) a number of similarities
are observed if one ignores the contribution of oxygen in figure 6. The residual oxygen
that we see could result from oxidation of the surface of the carbon film. Since films
deposited or modified by plasma can retain residual free radical activity, oxidation of
these films on exposure to air is highly probable.
When discussing plasma polymerization, Yasuda (1) defines
two regimes in which deposition can occur: a monomer deficient regime and an energy
deficient regime. The operating characteristic that distinguishes these two regimes is the
relationship between the composite power parameter (W/FM) and the sum of the bond energies
in the monomer per unit weight. W is the power supplied to the reactor in watts, M is the
molecular weight and F is the monomer flow rate in standard cc/min. When a sufficient
amount of energy is supplied such that (W/FM) exceeds the sum of the bond energies per
unit weight of the monomer, all bonds in the monomer are broken during the ionization
process. The polymerization occurs by a true atomic process. In the case of methane
deposition, the value for (W/FM) was 134 x I06 Joules/Kg. Since this value is
greater than the energy required to break all the bonds in the monomer - 104 x 106
Joules/Kg - we suspect that the polymerization of methane occurred by an atomic process.
Values of (W/FM) could not be calculated for deposition from the other monomers studies
since accurate flow data was not available.
Future work will focus on developing better correlations between the composite power
parameter, the deposition rate, and the structure of the film deposited in a
capacitively-coupled commercial system that develops a primary plasma. ESCA and FTIR
analytical techniques will be used to follow bond rearrangement and binding of carbon and hydrogen. This work
will also be extended to using the composite power parameter to define process
conditions for selectively breaking specific bonds along the chains of the polymer
substrate. Process conditions necessary to replace these bonds with chemical groups of
choice (molecular re-engineering) will be investigated. |