PLASMA
The Chemistry Tool for the
21st Century
By: Stephen L. Kaplan
INTRODUCTION
One hundred years ago, Sir
William Crooke stated "
. the investigation of the fourth state of matter -
plasma - will be one of the most challenging and exciting fields of human endeavor".
Even though it has found a major niche market (in excess of $ 1 billion) for the
fabrication of semiconductor devices, plasma remains an emerging technology still in its
embryonic stage in the industrial market place.
The product designer by using plasma technology is
unlimited in the choice of materials at his/her disposal for the design of any specific
component. The surfaces of materials can be easily and effectively modified via plasma
treatment for a variety of end uses without altering the properties of the bulk material.
Thus the designer may chose a plastic best suited for the application by its mechanical
properties and subsequently modify only the surface for optimum performance in a secondary
operation such as painting or bonding. Plasma processing offers a means for cost effective
surface engineering to provide performance and permanence to painting of even the most
difficult to paint plastics. And, plasma processes are workplace safe and environmentally
friendly. However, as will be discussed in this paper the most optimum results are most
readily achieved when the materials and paint suppliers as well as the manufacturer work
in collaboration.
PLASMA
Gas plasmas have existed since
the beginning of time, long before the advent of solids or liquids. In fact, 99 percent of
the universe is a plasma. Stars are plasmas. The solar corona is a plasma. Earth's natural
plasma include lightning, the Aurora Borealis, and St. Elmo's fire. Table I lists certain
plasma and characterizes them by particle density and temperature.
Table I
Ranges of
Particle Density and Temperature
for Various Types of Plasmas
|
Plasmas |
Particle Density (No./cm3)
|
Temperature (*K) |
Natural Plasmas
Stellar interiors Stellar atmospheres
Nebulae
Interstellar Space
Earth's ionosphere |
1022-10251010-1016
103
1-100
1010- 1012 |
~108104-106
104
102
102-103 |
| Manmade Plasma Thermonuclear plasma
Constricted arc plasma jets
Free-burning electric arcs
Combustion flames
Low-pressure arcs
Glow discharges |
1012 -1014
1016-1018
1016-1017
1016-1018
1010-1012
1010-1012 |
108-109
1-5x 104
7-10x103
3-5x103
1-3x103
300-600 |
There are many definitions of the term
"plasma" depending on ones particular discipline. It has often been referred to
as the fourth state of matter; the generation of plasma being analogous to the transitions
that occur when energy is supplied to a material causing solids to melt and liquids to
become gases. Sufficient additional energy supplied to a gas creates a plasma. In the case
of cold gas plasma, typical of that to be discussed in this paper, the process is
excitation of a gas at reduced pressure by radio frequency energy. A plasma contains
excited atomic, molecular, ionic and radical species. While on an atomic scale, plasma
generation cannot be construed as a room-temperature equilibrium process, the bulk of the
material remains near room temperature. The plasma contains free electrons as well as
other metastable particles which upon collision with the surfaces of polymers placed in
the plasma environment break covalent chemical bonds creating free radicals on the polymer
surface.2 These free radicals will then undergo additional reactions depending
on the gases present in the plasma or subsequent exposure to gases in the atmosphere. The
result is that these gas-radical reactions form a surface potentially very different from
the starting bulk polymer. Since the process is conducted in a reactor under very
controlled conditions, the end result is very reproducible.
Plasma processing is not one process but a
"tool box" that can be classified into three categories: 1) plasma activation,
2) plasma induced grafting and 3) plasma polymerization. Plasma activation is the simplest
and most cost efficient of these processes and more than adequate to prepare plastics for
painting. This paper will focus on plasma activation processes exclusively.
Plasma activation is the alteration of
surface characteristics by the substitution of chemical groups or moieties for groups
normally present on the polymer chain being modified. The mechanism is the reactions
resulting from the bombardment of the surface by photons, ions and neutral particles, all
of the active species in the plasma react with the polymer surface. The by-products,
typically C02, H20 and low molecular weight hydrocarbons, are
readily removed by the vacuum system. The use of co-reactants can serve to modify the
surface chemistry obtained with a single gas chemistry or to accelerate the reaction
kinetics. For example, in an oxygen plasma, the breaking of the carbon-carbon and
carbon-hydrogen bonds is the rate limiting step. When tetrafluoromethane is introduced as
co-reactant, the 02/CF4 plasma yields excited forms of 0, OF, CO, CF3,
C02, and F. Since fluorine or fluorine containing species are more effective in
breaking the carbon-carbon and carbon-hydrogen bonds, the reaction rate is accelerated.
The use of other gases permits the incorporation of other functional groups on the polymer
surface. Examples include the use of ammonia, nitrogen and nitrous oxide plasmas to
incorporate nitrogen on the surface and create nitrogen based functional groups such as
primary and secondary amines.
The result of plasma modification of the
polymer is an increase in the surface energy of the polymer and an attendant improvement
in surface wetting. Adequate wetting of the surface by the adhesive contributes to an
improvement in bond strength by increasing the apparent area of contact over which the
load is distributed. Published studies3-5 suggest that this improvement in
wetting directly contributes to the observed improvement in the strength of the adhesive
bond. However, evidence has been presented in several studics6-10 that indicate
that the major improvement of adhesive strength is dependent on the particular functional
group that has been created on the surface of the polymer. In some cases, a direct
correlation is drawn relating the nature of the chemical groups on the surface, the nature
of the adhesive used and the observed improvement in adhesion. In other cases, the
observed improvements are related to effects of hydrogen bonding and specific surface
chemical interactions that do not necessarily result in covalent bonding between the
polymer surface and the adhesive.
PLASMA PROCESSION
EQUIPMENT
While most, if not all, plasma
equipment consists of similar components, the design of the reactor chamber, the
distribution of power, the excitation frequency, and the gas dynamics can all be critical
parameters influencing the efficiency and properties of plasma reactions. There has been
an extensive amount of work published that shows a direct correlation between excitation
frequency and plasma reactivity. Manufacturers of plasma equipment employing radio
frequency excitation use either low frequencies, i.e. less than 400 KHz, or the higher
frequencies at 13.56 or 27.12 MHz as specified by the FCC. For applications involving the
treatment of plastics 13.56 MHz is the preferred frequency. Also important is whether the
material being treated is in a primary or secondary plasma. In a secondary plasma the
plasma is created either between closely spaced paired electrodes which may function as
shelves or in the annulus between the vessels outer wall and a ring or cage electrode. In
a secondary plasma the treatment of materials placed within the working volume depends on
the diffusion of active species created in the primary plasma, i.e., within the RF field.
Diffusion of these active species is the very creation of free radicals and subsequent
coupling of these free radicals with active species from the plasma environment. Depending
on the process gas selected, a large variety of chemical groups can be incorporated into
the surface. These groups may be hydroxyl, carbonyl, carboxylic, amino or peroxyl groups.
Most importantly, the insertion or substitution of these groups in the polymer chain is
under the control of the operator. In this manner, the surface energies and the surface
chemical reactivity of plastics can be completely altered without affecting their bulk
properties.
PLASMA ACTIVATION AND
REACTIONS ON THE SURFACE
Although any gas can be
ionized using RF excitation, gases such as 02, N2, He, Ar, NH3,
N20, C02, CF4, and air or some combination of these gases
are generally used for surface treatment.
One of the more common plasma processes used to
enhance the adhesion of polymers is surface treatment in an oxygen plasma. An oxygen
plasma is aggressive in its reactivity and forms numerous components. Within an oxygen
plasma 0+, 0-, 02 +, 02 -, 0, 03, ionized ozone, metastable excited 02, and free electrons
are generally observed. The ionization of oxygen into the various species found in an
oxygen plasma can be represented by the following reaction scheme.
|
02 + e -------- > 02 -
-------- > 0+0- e + 0 -------------> 0+ + 2e
e + 02 ------------->
02+ +2e
e + 202 -----------> 02-
+02
02- + 0 -----------> 03 +
e |
These reactions
represent a small sampling of those that occur in an oxygen glow discharge. As the
components formed during the ionization recombine, they release energy and photons,
emitting a faint blue glow and much UV radiation. The photons in the UV region have enough
energy to break the carbon-carbon and carbon-hydrogen bonds in the materials on the
surface that are exposed to the plasma. In the case of contaminants, the net effect
appears to be degradative such that lower molecular weight materials are created. These
lower molecular weight materials are subsequently removed by the vacuum. In this manner
the surface that has been exposed to a plasma is cleaned. Lower molecular weigh polymer
fractions that comprise the weak boundary layers on the surface are also removed in this
manner. In a low pressure oxygen plasma, the following oxidation reaction scheme has been
suggested.
|
RH+O ------ > R. + OH
R+02 ------ > R02.
RO2. + R' H ------ > R02H
+ R.
RO2 . + R ------ >
R02R |
Here the R02H and R02R
indicate the formation of acids and esters. Not indicated in the above reaction scheme are
the possible formation of alcohols, ethers, peroxides and hydroperoxides. Thus, besides
the dependent on pressure; the higher the pressure, the shorter the mean free path. The
mean free path is the distance active species can most likely travel before undergoing
collisions that deactivate radicals or neutralize ions. Therefore, when using a secondary
plasma, the concentration of active species varies either across the diameter of a barrel
system or between electrode pairs as the case may be. Thus, the physical laws of nature
deem that the treatment within the working volume of a secondary plasma system cannot be
uniform. By contrast when working within the RF field, or primary plasma, the gas is
constantly being excited. Thus, polymeric articles being treated are immersed in a
constant concentration of active species. Further, since diffusion is not a mechanistic
limitation, significantly higher operating pressures may be used. This allows higher
process gas flow rates assuring that off gassing molecules from the polymer are
sufficiently diluted providing the full benefits of the desired process gas. In addition,
the primary plasma is rich in ultraviolet radiation that is often an important initiation
step in polymer reactions. Since UV radiation is line of sight, uniform treatment of
multiple parts can only be assured when working within the primary plasma. Otherwise any
part in the shadow of another will receive different radiation and therefore the
effectiveness of the treatment is expected to vary. The plasma system used in the study
reported herein utilized a system designed and built by Plasma Science. All Plasma Science
equipment employ primary plasma in the treatment zone.
PERMANENCY OF PLASMA
TREATMENT
One of the first commercial
uses of plasma outside of the semiconductor industry was an activation process to enhance
adhesive bonding of molded silicone rubber gaskets in the assembly of military cylindrical
connectors. Plasma activation of the silicone allowed the use of conventional epoxy
adhesives to achieve adhesive bonds of silicone to metal where failure is characterized as
cohesive tearing of the silicone. These cylindrical connectors have been successfully
using plasma in their manufacture for more than twenty years and actual real time studies
show no deterioration of the bond quality with time, even though these connectors are
exposed to harsh storage and use conditions.
In other studies11-13 polyethylene fiber,
Spectra 1000, was treated and the surface modification characterized using Electron
Spectroscopy for Chemical Analysis (ESCA). The ESCA data showed that the types and
concentration of functional groups initially established were unchanged after a year
storage. Tests were not extended for longer periods, because there is no reason to believe
that any change with time will occur, as long as the material is protected from
contamination.
With some materials, such as TPO, a deterioration of
plasma effectiveness with time may be observed. However, ESCA analysis shows that the
functionality created by the plasma treatment has not changed, but rather, either an
external or internal impurity has contaminated the surface. Many commercial
plastics contain additives which with time may
migrate through the bulk material to the surface. Once at the surface, because of the high
activity of the plasma surface, it will spread rapidly and essentially bury the
functionalized surface under this "new surface" (contaminant). However, this
usually does not occur very rapidly and a properly designed facility with good house
keeping practices should find little sensitivity to aging within the typical production
line time spans. Of course only time and experience with specific materials and
applications can guarantee the efficacy of a plasma treated surface over extended time.
EXPERIMENTAL SECTION
Twelve full size fascias molded from a
commercial reactor grade thermoplastic polyolefin (TPO) were painted in a commercial
automotive production line. The fascias were painted with a commercial one component (IK)
base and clear paints; six fascias each of white and blue metallic. Six by four inch
(6" x 4") plaques were cut from six (6) different positions as follows: drivers
side ear, drivers side face, drivers top deck, passenger's side ear, passenger side face
and passenger side top deck. The plaques were subjected to Chrysler specification
MS-PA40-1 which requires subjecting the plaques to the following tests:
- Initial Adhesion (LP463PB1-5-01)
- 240 Hours Humidity (LP463PB-9-01)
- Cold Cycle Crack - Met. (LP463PB-22-01)
- Gravelometer (LP463PB-39-01)
- Gasoline Soak Resistance (MS-PA40-1)
The testing and data analysis was conducted by The Crown Group of
Warren, Ohio.
RESULTS
AND DISCUSSION
Two hundred eighty eight plaques (288) cut
from molded bumbers were tested and the following results obtained.
| Test |
Specification
Value |
White |
Met.
Blue |
| As received Adhesion |
|
|
|
"X" Scored
|
5A |
pass* |
pass* |
| 240 Hour Humidity Aging - 100% RH@100.F |
|
|
|
Blisters
|
none |
pass |
micro & fine blisters |
"X" Scored
|
5A |
pass |
pass |
Cross Hatch
|
5B |
pass |
pass |
| Cold Crack Cycle (Cycle IV) |
|
|
|
Blisters
|
none |
pass |
pass |
"X"Scored
|
5A |
pass |
pass |
Cross Hatched
|
5B |
pass |
pass |
| Gravelometer |
|
|
|
1 pin
|
#8 |
pass |
pass |
| Gas Resistance |
|
|
|
| soak |
no effect |
pass |
pass |
| *passes or exceeds specification requirements for
acceptance |
|
All of the white painted specimens
were satisfactory as tested. All metallic blue panels failed 240 hours humidity exposure
due to blistering. All other tests on the metallic blue met or exceeded the specification
requirements. The blisters were of the very small micro type variety. However,
specification MS-PA1-1 allows no blistering, thus failure. Interestingly, the blistered
samples also passed adhesion tests, an indication that the blisters were not adhesive in
nature. This was further proven by Electron Spectroscopy for Chemical Analysis (ESCA)
which showed TPO bound to the bottom side of microtomed blisters. This type of blister is
referred to as "solvent pop" where paint solvent migrates and dissolves into the
TPO bulk and is subsequently released during the elevated temperature humidity soak
rupturing the substrate causing lifting and the appearance of blisters. True blisters,
i.e. paint film separation from the substrate, would have no adhesive strength to the
substrate. The satisfactory performance of the white paint as opposed to the
humidity soak failure of the metallic blue is best be defined as a paint formulation or
substrate deficiency not a failure of the plasma surface treatment.
CONCLUSIONS
Whether it is the bonding of
polymers to other polymers or to other materials or the painting of polymer surfaces,
adhesion is a recurring and difficult problem for all industries that use polymer
materials as key components in their products. Designers often must select specially
formulated and expensive polymeric materials to ensure satisfactory adhesion (albeit, even
these materials often require surface preparation). In some cases, whole design concepts
must be abandoned due to the prohibitive cost of the required polymer or the failure of
crucial adhesive bonds. Gas plasma processes are the great equalizer making all polymers
and elastomers equally paintable eliminating paint adhesion or adhesion permanency as an
issue in the selection of a given polymer. Gas plasma glow discharge treatment typically
allows all polymers to achieve paint adhesion strength exceeding the bulk strength of the
substrate or paint. Failures do not occur at the paint film / substrate interface but
within the bulk of either the paint film or the substrate. And plasma is workplace and
environmentally friendly providing significant cost savings over any other means of volume
surface preparation.
However, plasma processing alone is not a panacea
for all problems. As seen in the data presented herein there must be a collaboration or at
minimum a cooperation between material and paint manufacturers to marry systems that will
provide the highest performance. It is unlikely that the same plasma process that improves
paint adhesion will alter the permeability of the substrate to reduce an its inherent
sensitivity to specific solvents that results in blistering. Thus, the cognizant engineers
at the manufacturing line must insist that the paint supplier provide paint properly
formulated to the sensitivities of the substrate, or select a substrate with appropriate
resistance to solvation by the paint system solvents.
The data presented shows that outstanding paint
adhesion to TPO fascia is readily achieved with plasma pretreatment. However, one system
failed to meet specifications because of microblistering after humidity soak. Despite the
presence of blisters these same specimens met all adhesion tests. Microscopic and chemical
analysis prove these blisters not to occur at the paint to substrate interface but, to
occur within the bulk of the substrate. Thus, the failure was not one caused by lack of
plasma treatment effectiveness, but a limitation of the substrate or solvent package of
the paint or a mismatch of the two.
Gas plasma is an effective method to obtain optimum
adhesion performance of painted plastic. Equipment is available that can cost effectively
treat large moldings such as fascia, instrument panel, or body cladding. Equipment that is
compatible with the manufacturing lines commonly employed in the automotive manufacturing
environment. The effluents from the plasma process are minimal and usually non-hazardous.
The effluent typically does not require any treatment prior to release to the environment.
Because of the energy efficiency of plasma processes in combination with their
effectiveness, workplace cleanliness, safety, and environmental friendliness, the cost
effectiveness of the total solution is unbeatable. It is 21st Century chemistry available
today.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
1. Sheer, C. "Arc Jets In A Science and
Technology", Vistas in Science (1968)
2. Boenig, H. V., Plasma Science and Technology, Cornell University
Press, New York 1982
3. Rantz, Leonard E., "Proper Surface Preparation: Bonding's
Critical First Step", Adhesives Age, May 1987
4. Prane, Joseph W., "Some Insight Into Why Adhesives
Adhere", Adhesives age, June 1989
5. Petrie, E. M., "Adhesively Bonding Plastics: Meeting an
Industry Challenge", Adhesives Age, May 1989
6. Rose, P. W. and Liston, E., "Gas Plasma Technology and
Surface Treatment of Polymers Prior to Adhesive Bonding", Proceedings of the SPE 43rd
ANTEC 1985
7. Londshien, M. and Michaeli, W., "Plasma Treatment - A
Technology to Improve Adhesion", ANTEC Montreal 1991
8. Kaplan, S. L. and Rose, P. W., "Plasma Surface Treatment of
Plastics", Society of Plastics Engineers, Technical Papers Volume 34, April 1988
9. Kaplan, S. L. and Rose, P. W., "Plasma Treatment Upgrades
Adhesion in Plastic Parts", Plastics Engineering, Vol. 44, No. 5, May 1988.
10. Hansen, G. P., Rushing, R.A., Warren R.W., Kaplan S.L., Kolluri,
O.S., "Achieving Optimum Bond Strength With Plasma Treatment", Technical Paper,
Society of Manufacturing Engineers, AD89-537, 1989
11. Kaplan, S. L., Rose, P. W., Nguyen, HX, Chang, H.W., "Gas
Plasma Treatment of Spectra TM Fiber", SAMPE Quarterly, Vol. 19, No.
4, July 1988.
12. Nguyen, HX, Riahi, G., Wood, G. and Poursartip, A.,
Optimization of Polyethylene Fiber Reinforced Composites Using a Plasma Surface Treatment,
Proceedings of The 33rd International SAMPE Symposium, SAMPE Symposium, SAMPE
1988, Anaheim, CA.
13. Kolluri, O.S., Kaplan, S. L., and Rose, P.W., "Gas Plasma
and the Treatment of Advanced Fibers", SPE Advan. Poly. Composites '88 RETEC 1988 |